Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1168
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Consumer Federation of America, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and others
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent:
James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2020cv01150
Plaintiff:
ANGLERS CONSERVATION NETWORK, GREAT EGG HARBOR RIVER COUNCIL, GREAT EGG HARBOR WATERSHED ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., TIMOTHY GALLAUDET, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Conservation Law Foundation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2020cv10820
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Merrimack River Watershed Council, Massachusetts Audubon Society, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, R.D. James and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor:
Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner:
People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2020cv00900
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Friends of the Earth, et al v. NRC, et al
as 20-1026
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Miami Waterkeeper and Friends of the Earth
Respondent:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2020cv00165
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, BORN FREE USA and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Oak Ridge Envlt Peace Alliance, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 19-6391
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RICHARD PERRY, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and LISA E. GORDON-HAGERTY, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ALLIANCE, ED SULLIVAN, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and others
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations et al v. Ross et al
as 3:2019cv07897
Defendant:
Secretary of the Int David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Plaintiff:
Institute for Fisheries Resources, Bay.Org d/b/a The Bay Institute, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Intervenor:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
