Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv06657
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Carroll, Police Officer Frank Feliciano, Narcotics Det. 25th John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Carroll et al
as 1:2023cv05491
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carroll, Frank Feliciano, John Hourican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Fredenburgh
as 9:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarro
Defendant:
Stacey Fredenburgh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. McCarthy
as 6:2020cv06094
Petitioner:
Vangie Navarro
Respondent:
Supt. Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarro v. McCarthy
as 9:2020cv00059
Petitioner:
Vangie Navarro
Defendant:
Supt. Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro v. USA
as 1:2018cv00385
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Javier Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Navarro v. Murphy et al
as 17-638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony M. Navarro
Defendant - Appellee:
Murphy, Warden, individual and official capacity, Chapdelaine, Warden, individual and official capacity, Jane Doe, #1, individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Hall, Captain, individual and official capacity, Gallagher, Ms., individual and official capacity, Cheryl A. Spano, individual and official capacity and others
Navarro Mendez v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01498
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Altagracia Navarro Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Navarro v. Murphy et al
as 3:2015cv00707
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Navarro
Defendant:
Murphy , Chapdelaine , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. George
as 1:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
Joseph Navarro
Defendant:
George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
