Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Doe, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shinaul v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07287
Plaintiff:
Davante Shinaul
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Gabriel Navarro, Antonio Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navarro v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2022cv03265
Plaintiff:
Frank Navarro, III
Defendant:
. Clarkson, Brittany Greene, . Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2022cv05721
Plaintiff:
Maria Navarro
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Walton et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05617
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walton
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Sergeant Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro Zuniga v. Mi Jalapeno 3 Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Francisco J Navarro Zuniga
Defendant:
Mi Jalapeno 3 Inc. and Francisco Casillas
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cheap Trick Merchandising, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv01888
Plaintiff:
Cheap Trick Merchandising, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", limingrong8338, Lindsey Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Navarro v. City of Aurora, Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv06288
Plaintiff:
Mario Navarro
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Illinois, Clark Johnson and The City Of Aurora, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cummings v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Michael Pettis, Stacy Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
