Cases 1 - 10 of 36
NEIL v. TATE et al.
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL NEIL
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN EDMUNDSON, LIEUTENANT FOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. WERNER et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER, THOMAS ROLA, JR, P/O NELL J CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAZYCK v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
KAREEM M. MAZYCK
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE and CORRECTIONS OFFICER NEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
PENDLETON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE, DOCTOR NEIL ROSENBLUM and DENNIS A. LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Neidig v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01772
Petitioner:
Neil Andrew Neidig
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mena v. Thompson
as 3:2021cv00632
Respondent:
Warden R. Thompson
Petitioner:
Neil Mena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CORBETT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv04527
Petitioner:
BURL NEIL CORBETT
Respondent:
ESQ. MICHAEL CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leach v. Biscoe et al
as 4:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Neil Inch-Diorio, Robert W Kelley, Diane Daya and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORBETT v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00102
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS
Petitioner:
BURL NEIL CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corbett v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv00313
Petitioner:
Burl Neil Corbett
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Michael Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
