Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen, Kenneth Allen, Kyle Amburgey and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv04095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
LeDay v. Glover et al
as 9:2021cv04030
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dylan LeDay
Defendant:
Amy Glover, Clark Ard and Neil Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03724
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, BASF Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Hogan and Mary Kay Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03248
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Neil Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaster v. Johnson
as 8:2021cv01449
Respondent:
Director Neil Johnson
Petitioner:
Frank M. Gaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2021cv00737
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Neil Tony Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rogers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv04426
Defendant:
Christopher Neil, Jeff Johnson and Lynnette Patton
Plaintiff:
Clifton Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv04198
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnson, Lt. Hammet, Major Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eichman v. Rissanen et al
as 2:2020cv04057
Defendant:
Town of James Island, Charleston County Sheriffs Office and Austin Rissanen
Plaintiff:
Neil Eichman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
