Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Larue et al v. UCOR LLC
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Larue, Laura Williams, J.D. Livingston and others
Defendant:
UCOR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Frankie Neil Spero and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Thomas v. BrandAuto Finance et al (TWP2)
as 1:2018cv00252
Defendant:
BrandAuto Finance and Northwest, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grissett v. USA (JRG3)
as 2:2017cv00130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jamar Vernest Neil Grissett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Penny v. Hamilton County Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Brian C Penny
Defendant:
Hamilton County Tennessee, CoreCivic, Inc., Chris Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Harney et al (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Carlos Williams
Defendant:
Pamela C Harney, Larry L Henry, Robert D Philyaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Team Health Holdings, Inc. (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00690
Defendant:
Team Health Holdings, Inc., H. Lynn Massingale, James L. Bierman and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Klein v. Team Health Holdings, Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Defendant:
Team Health Holdings, Inc., Leif M Murphy, H. Lynn Massingale and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Byrd v. Lee et al
as 2:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
George John Byrd
Defendant:
Randy Lee, Shannon Clark, Lundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hindman v. Stamina Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Justin Neil Hindman and Amy Hindman
Defendant:
Stamina Products, Inc. , Gold's Gym International, Inc. , TRT Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
