Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hattori et al v. Anand et al
as 1:2023cv11043
Plaintiff:
Mark Hattori and Susan Newman
Defendant:
Gaurav Anand, Matthew Christensen, Lydia Jett and others
Bryan v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07445
Plaintiff:
Aimee Bryan
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Neil Mehta, Benjamin Sun and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
Tang v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07239
Plaintiff:
Kia Tang
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand, Neil Mehta and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd. et al v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08756
Plaintiff:
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd., Naya Coldwater Fund, Naya Master Fund LP and others
Defendant:
Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Choi v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07309
Plaintiff:
David Choi
Defendant:
Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Katerra Inc. v. Marks et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Katerra Inc.
Defendant:
Michael E. Marks, Matthew W. Marsh, Ga-Lane Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States Department of Labor v. Federal Armament, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02045
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor and Milton Stewart
Defendant:
Neil Mehta and Federal Armament, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Mehta v. Angell Energy, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv02631
Defendant:
Angell Energy, LLC, Timothy Krieger, ABC Corps 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEHTA v. ANGELL ENERGY, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
NEIL MEHTA
Defendant:
ANGELL ENERGY, LLC, CHESAPEAKE TRADING GROUP, LLC, PEGASUS ENERGY FUTURES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEHTA v. ANGELL ENERGY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
NEIL MEHTA
Defendant:
ANGELL ENERGY, LLC, CHESAPEAKE TRADING GROUP, LLC, PEGASUS ENERGY FUTURES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
