Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vargas v. Cacio E. Pepe, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv21063
Plaintiff:
Nelson Vargas
Defendant:
Caico E. Pepe, LLC doing business as Alexander Greek Tavern and Jerome Axelrod
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vargas v. United States of America
as 16-2698
Petitioner:
Nelson Vargas
Respondent:
United States of America
Vargas v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2016cv05189
Petitioner:
Nelson Vargas
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vargas v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05120
Petitioner:
Nelson Vargas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vargas v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05044
Plaintiff:
Nelson Vargas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Ibanez (Vargas)
as 13-3436
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Ibanez, Felix Mejia-Castillo, Jose Matista and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Nelson Vargas
United States of America v. Lee (Parra)
as 13-2845
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Min Kon Lee, AKA Viejo, Oscar Teran, AKA Lorenzo, Margarito Guerrero, AKA Genaro and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Nelson Vargas Parra, AKA Flaco
Mahler v. The Southampton Hospital Association et al
as 2:2011cv06160
Defendant:
Kathy A. Berger-Walker, Police Officer Raymond Rau, Lawrence Rubin and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Mahler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. USA
as 1:2009cv03466
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nelson Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McBarron v. Fed Bureau Prisons, et al
as 08-10197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MCBARRON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NEWTON KENDIG, Director, Bureau of Prisons, LES E FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
