Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv07762
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation, Social Security Adminis. and Juliana Strattin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Pollard v. Netspend et al
as 1:2026cv04990
Plaintiff:
Aaron P Pollard
Defendant:
Netspend and Pathward NA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. NetSpend Corp
as 26-40079
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and NetSpend Legal Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Combs et al v. Brinks Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01812
Plaintiff:
Matthew M. Combs
Defendant:
Brinks Inc., NetSpend and Republic Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-13924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dana Hughes v. Netspend Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv07065
Plaintiff:
Dana Hughes
Defendant:
Netspend Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Exzac, Inc. v. Ouro Global, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Exzac Inc. doing business as Matrix International Financial Services
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Ouro Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bryant v. Travelers Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
Travelers Insurance, Property & Casualty Insurance, Netspend Prepaid Credit Card and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
