Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jafri v. NH Supreme Court Committee on Character & Fitness, et al
as 22-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FARVA JAFRI
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW HAMPSIRE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON CHARACTER & FITNESS, NEW HAMPSIRE SUPREME COURT OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS, SHERRY HIEBER, in her individual and official capacity and others
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bourne v. New Hampshire, State of, et al
as 1:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Bourne
Defendant:
Carol Ann Conboy, Linda Stewart Dalianis, James E. Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Meara v. New Hampshire Supreme Court
as 1:2012cv00182
Respondent:
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
Timothy O'Meara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Farley v. DeHart
as 11-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD N. FARLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. DEHART, General Counsel, Attorney Discipline Office, New Hampshire Supreme Court Attorney Discipline System, PAULA M. DESAULINER, Esq., ROBERT T. MITTELHOLZER, Executive Director, New Hampshire Judicial Conduct Committee and others
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2671
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
