Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mai v. New York State Office of Temporary and Disability
as 23-23
Petitioner:
Hong Mai
Respondent:
New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, New York State Department of Health, New York City Department of Health and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Mai v. The New York State Office of T
as 22-915
Petitioner:
Hong Mai
Respondent:
CVS Pharmacy at 338 East 23rd Street, NYC 10010, The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, The New York State Department of Health and others
Beverley v. New York City Health and Hospi
as 20-1399
Defendant / Appellee:
Mitchell Katz, President and Chief Operating Office of NYC Health and Hospitals Corp. and ndividually, Plachikkat Anantharam, Chief Financial Officer of NYC Health and Hospitals Corp. and Individually, New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mauvareen Beverley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drew v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv04067
Defendant:
Jeffries, Correction Officer Richard, Mr. Ricky and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv09169
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Lionel Brown, New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
