Cases 11 - 20 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07561
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez Lopez et al v. The Boil C & C Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv06741
Plaintiff:
Norman Adalid Perez Lopez
Defendant:
The Boil C & C Corp. doing business as The Boil, DD76 Inc. doing business as The Boil, Donald Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Dinh et al
as 3:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
David X. Dinh, Thi Quynh Le Nguyen and Sarah M. Dinh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In Re: Andre Wilburn
as 23-1032
Petitioner:
Andre Wilburn
Respondent:
Virginia Nguyen, Andrew Grubin, Carolyn Pokorny and others
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wilburn v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2023cv04082
Plaintiff:
Andre Wilburn
Defendant:
Virginia Nguyen, Robert Polemeni, Andrew Grubin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. Pho Vietnam 87 Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04298
Plaintiff:
Hung Nguyen
Defendant:
Pho Vietnam 87 Corporation, Pho 87 Vietnamese Restaurant Inc. and Nancy Huynh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
