Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Nguyen v. Greff
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Minh Nguyen
Defendant:
Clancy Greff doing business as Captain Zodiac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Salcido v. Nguyen
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Andrew Salcido
Defendant:
Nguyen Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jose v. Maui Electric Company, Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jose, Chi Guyer, Krystal Cunningham and others
Defendant:
Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gutierrez v. Fujimoto et al
as 1:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Fred Gutierrez
Defendant:
Shawn Fujimoto, Maila Nguyen, Allen Ishida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Thao Thi Nguyen, Mimi, Thao Ray and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nguyen v. USA
as 1:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Thao Thi Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
John Doe v. Cong Ty Co Phan Modoho et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Defendant:
Cong Ty Co Phan Modoho also known as Modoho JSC doing business as Modoho, Modoho JSC, Dao Huy Dat and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nguyen v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cuong Ba Mark Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
v. Vishwanath et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
MY TIEN Thi HUYNH, Thuy Dung Ta, HOANG LY THI HOANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
