Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. v. M Vince Nail Spa, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. doing business as M. Vince Nail Spa
Defendant:
Binh T. Nguyen, M Vince Nail Spa, LLC, Raymond T. Do and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nguyen v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00017
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Khe Nguyen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nguyen v. Boylan et al
as 2:2021cv02003
Defendant:
A. Juarez, D. Ingleharte, James Preble and others
Plaintiff:
Hai Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Northrup et al
as 3:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Nguyet Nguyen and John Northrup
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Nguyen v. Aparium Hotel Group, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02865
Plaintiff:
Minh Auh Nguyen
Defendant:
79 Madison Avenue, LLC, Aparium Hotel Group, LLC and 79 Madison Avenue, LLC doing business as Hu Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nguyen v. Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00871
Defendant:
John Does #1-6, Jane Does #7-11 and Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hai K. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Northland Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv02927
Plaintiff:
Thinh Nguyen
Defendant:
Northfield Insurance Company
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nguyen et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Tung Nguyen and Boyong Park
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McBride v. Nguyen
as 1:2009cv01219
Plaintiff:
Kelsey McBride
Defendant:
Tam Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
