Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KIM v. MOBILIA et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SARA KIM
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MOBILIA, MICHELE S. HARTZELL and NORTH EAST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KELLY EL v. MARTINI
as 2:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
GENE KELLY EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MARTINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONTANO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04473
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. MONTANO and LINDA MONTANO
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Movant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
ARNEAULT et al v. O'TOOLE et al
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT and GREGORY J. RUBINO
Defendant:
KEVIN F. O'TOOLE , R. DOUGLAS SHERMAN , E. BARRY CREANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIRCHILD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54743
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. FAIRCHILD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAGUDIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52728
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. LAGUDIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARINELLI v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. MARINELLI
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GANNAWAY v. BERKS COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2009cv04501
Plaintiff:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY PRISON, NICHOLAS C STROUNBAKIS, TIMOTHY M. DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRASS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv02615
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. GRASS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
