Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-71928
: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest: KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-71692
: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director o fthe Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest: KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01553
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Juliana, et al v United States of America, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv01517
Plaintiff: Jaime B., Nathaniel B., Victoria B. and others
Defendant: Ashton Carter, Shaun Donovan, Anthony Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maestas v. State of Nevada ex rel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00301
Defendant: Lovelock Correctional Center, Nevada, State Of, R. Olivas and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas V. Maestas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christina Pica-Van Dyke et al v. Bulldog Manufacturing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06505
Defendant: Bulldog Manufacturing Company, CBS Corporation, Certaineed Corporation and others
ThirdParty Defendant: CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. and Roes
Unknown: Derek S Johnson, Charles T Sheldon, Allison Low and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff: Phillip Alan Pica, Tina Marie Pica and Christina Pica-Van Dyke
Maestas v. LeGrand et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00585
Defendant: C/O Bennett, Tara Carpenter, C/O DeGoyler and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas V. Maestas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. California Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01615
Plaintiff: Nicholas V. Rich
Defendant: California Department of Corrections, Kelly Harrington and J. Vanderpoel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?