Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Nie v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jo Nie
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. Li et al
as 1:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Defendant:
Xin Li, Ruixiang Nie and Z APPs
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
The Smiley Company SPRL
as 1:2023cv22352
Plaintiff:
The Smiley Company SPRL
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, Or Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., zerogiving, Zeckos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
USA v. Rong Nie
as 23-3013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rong Nie
Harry Nie v. Rebecca Beach Smith, et al
as 22-5326
Petitioner / Appellant:
Harry Nie
Respondent / Appellee:
Rebecca Beach Smith, Judge, Raymond A. Jackson, Judge, Douglas E. Miller, Judge and others
Crivellaro v. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv07499
Plaintiff:
Piero Crivellaro
Defendant:
Singularity Future Technology Ltd., Yang Jie, Lei Cao and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
