Cases 1 - 10 of 1,037
Blankenship v. MCSD name not known to me
as 4:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Thomas Macan Blankenship
Defendant:
MCSD name not known to me
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conroy v. L E A M Drilling Services
as 6:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Alan Conroy
Defendant:
LEAM Drilling Services and R E M E L L C improperly named as L E A M Drilling Services doing business as L E A M Drilling Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Garcia v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Omar Garcia
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc., First Name Unknown Last Name Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00890
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00868
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
