Cases 41 - 50 of 410
Noco Company v. Sigma Solution LLC
as 1:2021cv02130
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Sigma Solution LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Reclaimed Assets Group LLC
as 1:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Reclaimed Assets Group LLC doing business as RA Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Noco Company v. Rush Wholesale Co. LLC
as 1:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Rush Wholesale Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01483
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Topdon and USA Topdon, LLC doing business as Topdon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Noco Company v. Shanghai Greatway Welding Equipment Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shanghai Greatway Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. doing business as Topac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Mithlond LLC
as 1:2021cv01457
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Mithlond LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Xinshengfeng Trading Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Xinshengfeng Trading Co., Ltd. doing business as Autoxel
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company v. OJ Commerce, LLC
as 21-3488
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOCO COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
OJ COMMERCE, LLC
Noco Company v. Hong Kong Hexin Group Co., LTD.
as 1:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Hong Kong Hexin Group Co. Ltd. doing business as Suhu and Hong Kong Hexin Group Co., LTD. doing business as Suhu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Payne Electronic Commerce Co., LTD.
as 1:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Payne Electronic Commerce Co., LTD. doing business as Sihanm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
