Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Perez-Vasquez v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE . ALL PLEADINGS SHOULD BE FILED IN CRIMINAL 15-cr-10338-FDS
as 1:2022cv11469
Petitioner:
Noe Salvador Perez-Vasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Town of Monterey et al
as 3:2022cv30117
Plaintiff:
Terry Walker
Defendant:
Town of Monterey, Melissa Noe, in her Official and Individual capacity, Donald Coburn, in his Official and Individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Clapp v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10426
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Clapp
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Michael W. Morrissey, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Duane R. Bonlie and Jane E. Bloom, as trustees of 590 Condominium Trust et al
as 1:2017cv10226
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. XSZ64308
Defendant:
Duane R. Bonlie, Kevin T McLaughlin , Noe Reyes, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10431
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Noe v. USA
as 1:2011cv10612
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Farrah v. Gondella et al
as 1:2007cv12075
Plaintiff:
Louis J Farrah, II
Defendant:
Stephen R. Gondella, Mark F Blanchard, Mark Rivet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
