Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lopez et al v. International Drywall Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07026
Plaintiff:
David Matias Lopez, Mynor Ismael Tomas Perez, Noe Arnoldo Lopez Miranda and others
Defendant:
International Drywall Inc. and Juan Diaz Lemus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sorto-Lopez v. Garland
as 21-88
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE NOE SORTO-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Pedro Villeda-Lopez
as 19-50344
Defendant / Appellee:
PEDRO NOE VILLEDA-LOPEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VARGAS DUBON et al v. MIK AND MI, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02300
Plaintiff:
JOSE VARGAS DUBON and NOE GUZMAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
SUE MI FOULADI, MIK AND MI, INC. and MIK AND MI, INC. doing business as CAFE 59
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez et al v. 215 Soho Cafe Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv03358
Defendant:
215 Soho Cafe Corp., 8312 Soho Caf Corp. and Jose Zosayas
Plaintiff:
Nicasio Flores, Noe Isidoro Lopez and Jose Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez Paz v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Noe I Lopez Paz
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lopez et al v. 120 Pho Real Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv00432
Plaintiff:
Noe Isidoro Lopez
Defendant:
120 Pho Real Corp. , Benjamin Binh Thai Luong and Michael Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Noe Lopez-Lorenzo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72499
Petitioner:
NOE LOPEZ-LORENZO, AKA Noe Moreno Lopez-Lorenzo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Noe Lopez
as 14-50100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOE RAMIREZ LOPEZ
Toribio-Stair et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00996
Plaintiff:
Tonya E. Toribio-Stair and Noe T. Lopez
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
