Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Agner v. Shapiro
as 2:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lane Agner
Defendant:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Strickland et al
as 3:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gino V. Jackson
Defendant:
J. Bruce Strickland, Daniel M. Chichester, John H. Chichester and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Olsen et al
as 3:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Gino V. Jackson
Defendant:
Eric L. Olsen, Daniel M. Chichester, Phong Michael Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Agner v. Shapiro
as 2:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lane Agner
Defendant:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nolan v. O'Brien
as 7:2008cv00511
Petitioner:
Dontarion Nolan
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dance et al v. City Of Richmond Police Department et al
as 3:2007cv00534
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dance, III, Nathaniel Dance, III, Gipson's LTD. and others
Defendant:
City Of Richmond Police Department, Thomas Nolan, Frank Misiano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Manship v. Trodden et al
as 1:2007cv00772
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard Trodden, "Officer" Toomey, M. Douglas Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Price v. Amchem Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03218
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc., Dana Corporation, General Refractories Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Nolan Price, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
