Cases 61 - 70 of 599
Out East Accessories Inc. v. Grace et al
as 1:2022cv03101
Plaintiff:
Out East Accessories Inc.
Defendant:
Dylan Grace and Martha Nolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
He v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Chunling He
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lin v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Jun Lin
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Butt et al v. Jaddou et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Usman Butt and Sophia Butt
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, AAD Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
David v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Steven David
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Perry v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02074
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Bobby Kotick, Legal Aid Brian Kelly and others
R.M.P. v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
RMP
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Deputy Director Larry Denayer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lande v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
John Lande
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
BAKER v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., REVETA BOWERS, ROBERT CORTI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
