Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Nolan v. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Nolan
Defendant:
Jerry Scott, Killman and Sumner County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Nolan
as 3:2019cv00152
Plaintiff:
Leonard Chambers
Defendant:
Josh Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Big G Express, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Big G Express, Inc., Big G Express Employee Stock Ownership Plan, David A. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Darby v. Pilot Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Nolan C. Darby
Defendant:
Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lucas v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Nolan Lucas
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail and Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Office and Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darries Jackson
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Office and Jail, Esco Jarnigan, Wayne Mize and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Holloway (VVV)
as 3:2014cv00375
Petitioner:
Dameion Nolan
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheffield et al v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority
as 1:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sheffield , Shana Nolan , Wendy Wattenbarger and others
Defendant:
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Steven Gerald Reed
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee , Bill Bivens , Johnny Edward Bates, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
