Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Noonan v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Noonan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. Noonan et al
as 4:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jesse J. Stewart
Defendant:
Branden J. Noonan and Kevin Small
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noonan v. Wahlert et al
as 4:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Daniel Noonan
Defendant:
Teresa A. Wahlert and David Eklund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sagez et al v. Global Agricultural Investments, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv04100
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sagez , Barb Buesing , Dean Buesing and others
Defendant:
Global Agricultural Investments, LLC, Tyler Bruch, Bruchside, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Sagez et al v. Global Agricultural Investments, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sagez , Barb Buesing , Dean Buesing and others
Defendant:
Global Agricultural Investments, LLC, Tyler Bruch, Bruchside, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Jones v. Luedtke et al
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Jones
Defendant:
Edward J Luedtke, John Fayram, Jake Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JC et al v. Noonan et al
as 4:2010cv00559
Plaintiff:
JC , April Clark , Travis Clark and others
Defendant:
Daniel Noonan, Sherri White, Jason Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blodgett v. Mayo et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Curt Mayo, Jake Noonan, State of Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grandberry v. Oldfather et al
as 1:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
Larenzo Grandberry
Defendant:
Christerfer Oldfather, Kurt Mayo, Jake Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blodgett v. Caspers et al
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Randy Caspers, Major Mayo, Jake Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
