Cases 1 - 10 of 58
GREATHOUSE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
RONALD A. GREATHOUSE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Christopher Martz, Sr. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 23-2691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
KLINE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 5:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
ELEN KLINE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Soberal v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 2:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jose Soberal
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CUCALON et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. et al
as 2:2020cv01429
Plaintiff:
LINA ROCIO CABRERA and DANIEL CUCALON
Defendant:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LUTHER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 3:2019cv00138
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Plaintiff:
TYLOR LUTHER
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SULLIVAN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
SUSAN M. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Piltz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 1:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
James H. Piltz
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
In Re: Paulsboro Derailment Ce, et al
as 16-3263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD J. MORRIS and KRISTEN PICKEL
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
In re: Paulsboro Derailment
as 16-3172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD J. MORRIS and KRISTEN PICKEL, (husband & wife)
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
