Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al v. The City of Laurel, Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , Laurel Wholesale Feed, LLC , Viking Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
South Mississippi Electric Power Association v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2010cv00310
Plaintiff:
South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Counter_claimant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Counter_defendant:
South Mississippi Electric Power Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Corinth, Mississippi v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
City of Corinth, Mississippi
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cameron v. Wall et al
as 2:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Susan Cameron and Susan Cameron
Defendant:
Tommy Wall, R. M. Treadwell, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BNSF Railway Company et al v. United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
as 4:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Defendant:
United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Thibodeaux v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2009cv04163
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Ernest Thibodeaux, Jr., Ernest Thibodeaux, Jr. and Ernest Thibodeaux, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Rail Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
