Cases 21 - 30 of 309
CURGES v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
SALAHEAN CURGES
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kulp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2022cv01818
Plaintiff:
Bryanna Kulp
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Swatara Township et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Swatara Township and Swatara Township Stormwater Authority
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
MANSFIELD et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MANSFIELD and MATTHEW MARCHIONDA
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
UTTI v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2022cv02602
Plaintiff:
CRISTINA F. UTTI
Defendant:
WAYNE MARTIN and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
SMITH v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
CARMON R. SMITH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 4:2021cv02173
Plaintiff:
UGI Utilities, Inc.
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
