Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
as 22-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant: NO MID-CURRITUCK BRIDGE-CONCERNED CITIZENS AND VISITORS OPPOSED TO THE MID-CURRITUCK BRIDGE and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, EDWARD T. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration and others
Defendant: JAMES H. TROGDON, III
Jenny Bruns, et al v. USAA, et al
as 22-5011
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jenny Bruns and Jeremy Bruns
Defendant / Appellee: USAA, Reuben F. Young, Robert N. Hunter, Jr. and others
League of Women Voters v. RNC
as 20-1728
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MANDY COHEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT K. PRIDDY, III, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, LELIA BENTLEY and others
Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor: TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity a President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
North Carolina Wildlife Federation et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00014
Defendant: James H. Trogdon, III, Edward T. Parker, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff: North Carolina Wildlife Federation and No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens and Visitors Opposed to the Mid-Currituck Bridge
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
as 1:2018cv00541
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Save Our Sound, OBX, Inc. et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation et al Administrative Record in case number 2:17-CV-4-FL
as 2:2017mc00001
Plaintiff: Save Our Sound, OBX, Inc., Thomas Aschmoneit, Richard Ayella and others
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Transportation, James H. Trogdon, III, Federal Highway Administration and others
Intervenor_defendant: Defenders of Wildlife and National Wildlife Refuge Association
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. North Carolina Department of Transportation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00270
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First NBC Bank
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Intervenor: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. North Carolina Department of Transportation ***Do not docket in this case. New case number: 5:17-cv-270-BO***
as 4:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First NBC Bank
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Intervenor: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Save Our Sound OBX, Inc., et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff: Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. , Mark Haines , Jer Mehta and others
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Transportation , Federal Highway Administration, John F. Sullivan, III and others
Intervenor_defendant: Defenders of Wildlife and National Wildlife Refuge Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. FRA, et al
as 16-1352
Petitioner: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Respondent: Federal Railroad Administration and United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?