Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LANGLEY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
DIANNA W. LANGLEY
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, GROUP SHORT TERM DISABILITY AND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NOVANT HEALTH, INC., PLAN NUMBER 502 and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-ERISA
ALLEN v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
KEITH VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NOVACK v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOVACK
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
In re: NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CURRY and CHRISTINE CURRY
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gurney v. Novant Health, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gurney
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Darroux v. Novant Health, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Micandria Darroux
Defendant:
Novant Health, Inc. doing business as Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Asr v. Giftos et al
as 3:2021cv00670
Plaintiff:
Leila Nasser Asr
Defendant:
Peter M. Giftos and Novant Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
