Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,087
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01823
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramirez v. Pfeiffer et al
as 3:2024cv01714
Plaintiff: Narciso Ramirez
Defendant: Warden C Pfeiffer, R. Nunez and N. Karlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff: Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant: J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-776
Petitioner: ALAN REYES MURILLO, ANGELES REYES NU EZ, VILMA NUNEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Nunez
as 24-599
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRES NUNEZ
Vargas Garzon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-528
Petitioner: CRISTIAN A. VARGAS GARZON, KAREN S. TAMAYO NUNEZ and SARA VARGAS TAMAYO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robert Nunez v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Robert Nunez
Defendant: Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
Earle v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: Vivian Alexander Earle
Defendant: Unknown Coleman, Unknown Nunez, Unknown Formato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?