Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Misuraca v. Ireland, et al.
as 24-2843
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Defendant:
STEPHEN IRELAND, all individual and in their official capacities, Nurse Practitioner FRANKS, (NP Franks) (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities, ASHLEY CLEMMENTS, (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities and others
Anderson v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix
as 24-2574
Petitioner:
IRA JOE ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Interested Party:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, ADCRR, KARANJA ADAMS, Nurse Practitioner at Naphcare Inc., RODNEY STEWART, Doctor at Naphcare Inc. and others
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. RHS Chiropractic, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02172
Defendant:
Clarissa Felix, Roman Israilov, RHS Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 24-435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LURA MERITT, Nurse Practitioner, STAF B-Fac., CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY AND STATE PRISON AT CORCORAN, MONICA FISHBURN and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
In re: Subpoenas Served On:
as 23-7025
In Re:
In re: Subpoenas Served On:
Petitioner / Appellant:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrine Society, World Professional Association for Transgender Health and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Weida
In Re: SUBPOENAS SERVED ON
as 1:2023mc00004
In Re:
SUBPOENAS SERVED ON:
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, WORLD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR TRANSGENDER HEALTH and others
Respondent:
JASON WEIDA
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
