Cases 1 - 10 of 612
Nye v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Ruby Nye
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sivak v. Nye
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venter et al v. Nye County
as 2:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Willem Christoffel Jacobus Venter and Robert James Hutchison
Defendant:
Nye County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Whitesell v. Nye County Sherriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
John Tony Whitesell
Defendant:
Nye County Sherriffs Office and Serenity Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill, Amanda K. Brailsford and David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Nye County School District et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Nye County School District and G.K.G. by and through his Parents Anthony Gregory & Dawn Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett v. Allen et al.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lisa Garrett
Defendant:
Cruz D. Allen, Trance M. Van Liere, Thomas Develin and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
