Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Marin et al v. O.S. Interior Systems, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01292
Plaintiff: Guillermo Marin and Ronald Marin
Defendant: O.S. Interior Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Henry v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05206
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Ruthie O.E. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O.S. Security LLC v. Schlage Lock Company LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00319
Defendant: Allegion plc, Ingersoll-Rand Co., Ingersoll-Rand Plc and others
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
O.S. Security LLC v. Alarm Lock Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00312
Defendant: Alarm Lock Systems, Inc. and Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
O.S. Security LLC v. Kaba Ilco Corp. et al
as 8:2014cv00316
Defendant: Kaba Holding AG and Kaba Ilco Corp.
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
O.S. Security LLC v. John D. Brush & Co., Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00314
Defendant: John D. Brush & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
O.S. Security LLC v. First Alert, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00310
Defendant: BRK Brands, Inc., First Alert, Inc. and Jarden Corporation
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
O.S. Security LLC v. Sargent Manufacturing Company et al
as 8:2014cv00318
Defendant: Assa Abloy AB, Assa Abloy Inc. and Sargent Manufacturing Company
Plaintiff: O.S. Security LLC
WULTZ et al v. BANK OF CHINA LTD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013mc01282
Plaintiff: SHERYL WULTZ , YEKUTIEL WULTZ , AMANDA WULTZ and others
Defendant: BANK OF CHINA LTD
Movant: STATE OF ISRAEL
Intervenor: RIVKA MARTHA MORIAH , ATARA NESIA MORIAH , DAVID MORIAH and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
N.S. and O.S. v. New York City Department of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv07819
Plaintiff: N.S. and O.S.
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?