Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Odom v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2023cv16695
Petitioner:
David Odom
Respondent:
Raul Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Odom v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50388
Petitioner:
David Odom
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Odom v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv15068
Petitioner:
David T Odom
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Odom v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12094
Plaintiff:
Nona Odom
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Odom v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10834
Plaintiff:
Karen Odom
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Odom v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08505
Plaintiff:
Catherine Odom
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Odom v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2022cv05355
Plaintiff:
Christophernisha Odom
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elliott v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv50291
Plaintiff:
Brendan George Elliott
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Andrew Sullivan, Rodger Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammad Iskan Investments, LLC v. Odom
as 1:2022cv03272
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Iskan Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Ameshia Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Odom v. Health Department
as 3:2021cv01204
Plaintiff:
Teron Odom
Defendant:
Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
