Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DENNIS v. FAW et al
as 1:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Sarah Dennis
Defendant:
Officer Zan Faw, Officer Ryan McKee, City of Indianapolis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, Jr. v. Valparaiso Community School Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
James R. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Valparaiso Community School Corporation, Principal Loren Hershberger, Chief Jeffrey Balon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COX v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv01393
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Weitzel, City of Indianapolis, Officer Michael O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSHA v. TOWN OF WHITESTOWN INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Defendant:
OFFICER RYAN BATTS, BOONE COUNTY INDIANA, BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF MICHAEL T. NIELSON and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN POSHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mehok v. Hobart Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mehok
Defendant:
Hobart Police Department, Hobart Police Department Chief of and Officer Ryan Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSBORN v. WAYSON et al
as 1:2013cv01668
Plaintiff:
TARA OSBORN
Defendant:
OFFICER RYAN SHERWOOD and SHERIFF WILLIAM WAYSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRUCK v. TOWN OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2011cv01521
Defendant:
Officer J. HAWKINS, Officer RYAN JONES and TOWN OF FISHERS
Plaintiff:
SCOTT E. STRUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Crown Point Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Donald Campbell
Defendant:
City of Crown Point Police Department and Officer Ryan Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMPKINS v. BILBREY et al
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
KELVIN L. LAMPKINS
Defendant:
OFFICER SGT. RICHARD BILBREY, OFFICER RYAN WALLACE and SGT. MAJOR WANDA PULLIAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
