Civil Rights Cases
Timothy Rote v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of th, et al
as 22-35261
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY C. ROTE
Defendant / Appellee: COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON STATE BAR AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY FUND and others
JOHNSON v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2021cv02615
Plaintiff: DERRICK JOHNSON
Defendant: JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT and COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rote v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01988
Defendant: ELIZABETH WEISHAUPL, Oregon State Bar, SUSIE NORBY and others
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY C. ROTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTE v. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01299
Defendant: ELIZABETH WEISHAUPL, OREGON STATE BAR, SUSIE NORBY and others
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY ROTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01894
Plaintiff: JOHN R. ADAMS
Defendant: JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, R. GUY COLE, COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Four Directions et al v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03022
Petitioner: Four Directions , Indian People's Actions and Sara Plains Feather
Respondent: Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States and Cathy A. Catterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?