Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff: EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant: ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant: PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
United States of America et al v. Crowley Marine Services Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: The United States of America, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Department of the Interior, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: Crowley Marine Services, Inc., 8th Avenue Terminals, Inc., Washington Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd. v. Fenix Marine Services, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff: Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd.
Defendant: Fenix Marine Services, Ltd., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Fenix Marine Services, Ltd. doing business as Fenix Marine Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hill et al v. Pacific Maritime Association et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant: APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Taurus Marine, Inc. v. Unknown Claimants
as 4:2023cv06120
Plaintiff: TAURUS MARINE, INC., owner and CROSS LINK, INC. dba WESTAR MARINE SERVICES owner pro hac vice of the vessels WESTAR III, WESTAR VII, WESTAR XII, and their engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc. and Taurus Marine, Inc. owner pro hac vice of the vessels Westar III, Westar VII, Westar XII, and their engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc. agent of Cross Link, Inc. doing business as Westar Marine Services
Claimant: Unknown Claimants
In Re Subpoena of Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00141
Plaintiff: In Re Subpoena Issued to Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc. in American President Lines, LLC v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc., et al., American President Lines, LLC, APL Martime, Ltd. and others
In Re: Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc.
Defendant: Matson, Inc., Matson Navigation Company, Inc. and Matson Logistics, Inc.
Fog Marine, LLC v. Resolve Marine Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00141
Defendant: Resolve Alaska Holdings, Inc., Resolve Marine Group, Inc., Resolve Equipment Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Fog Marine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Powell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff: Progressive Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance
Defendant: Beau Powell, Nicole Beall, The Estate of Suzanne Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Brown et al v. APL Maritime Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv06999
Plaintiff: QUENTIN BROWN, FAHMI RAHMANI and Quentin M. Brown
Defendant: APL Maritime Ltd., APL Marine Services, LTD., American President Lines, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watson et al v. Roff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01622
Plaintiff: Eric Watson doing business as Jookrs Hulk Hauling & Salvage Services, Sarah Watson doing business as Jookrs Hulk Hauling & Salvage Services and Sarah M Watson doing business as Jookrs Hulk Hauling & Salvage Services
Defendant: Mike Roff Latitude Marine Services CEO doing business as Latitude Marine Services, KJ Roff Latitude Marine Services President doing business as Latitude Marine Services, Chrisi Dite Latitude Marine Services Service Writer doing business as Latitude Marine Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?