Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Health Net Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Satya Health of California, Inc., Adeona Healthcare, Inc. and others
Defendant: Health Net Life Insurance Company and Optum Services, Inc.
Claimant: Florentine Holding Company V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Health Net Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff: Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Satya Health of California, Inc., Adeona Healthcare, Inc. and others
Defendant: Health Net Life Insurance Company and Optum Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Ctr., et al v. Centene Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-55962
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUAL DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT CENTER, INC., a California corporation, SATYA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, ADEONA HEALTHCARE, INC., a California corporation and others
Claimant: LAST CHANCE FUNDING INC. and FLORENTINE HOLDING COMPANY V, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CENTENE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MICHAEL NEIDORFF, an individual, HEALTH NET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant: LIANN GOHARI, KENNETH B. JULIAN, JOHN LEBLANC and others
Ryan S. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56310
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., a California corporation, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN S., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health & Life Ins. Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55821
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY, HUMANA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Centene Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv04112
Defendant: CENTENE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, HEALTH NET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, ILEANA HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff: DUAL DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT CENTER, INC., a California corporation, ADEONA HEALTHCARE, INC., a California corporation, SHREYA HEALTH OF ARIZONA, INC., an Arizona corporation and others
Claimant: Last Chance Funding Inc. and Florentine Holding Company V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Addiction Health Alliance, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al
as 8:2019cv02372
Defendant: UHC OF CALIFORNIA,, UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, VIANT, INC., and others
Plaintiff: ADDICTION HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TML Recovery, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al
as 8:2019cv02083
Defendant: HEALTHCARE INSURANCE, OPTUMINSIGHT, INC, VIANT, INC., and others
Plaintiff: TML Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
MMR Services, LLC v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv02082
Defendant: UHC OF CALIFORNIA, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, and others
Plaintiff: MMR SERVICES, LLC, and MMR Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Womans Recovery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv02084
Plaintiff: WOMANS RECOVERY CENTER, LLC
Defendant: OPTUM SERVICES INC., UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.,, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?