Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara Reyes et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02598
Plaintiff:
Salvador Guevara Reyes and Dixie Daniel Galvez Ortega
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortega v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv02206
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-3, Debra Fessenden, Andre Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ortega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ortega v. Rolf Tide, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01474
Plaintiff:
Adam Ortega
Defendant:
Rolf Tide, LLC and Philip Krajeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wiltz v. Carlton
as 3:2011cv00665
Petitioner:
Ortega Wiltz
Respondent:
Howard Carlton and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiltz v. Carlton
as 3:2011cv00296
Petitioner:
Ortega Wiltz
Respondent:
Howard Carlton and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jimenez et al v. Vanderbilt Landscaping LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
Hilario Razura Jimenez , Jose Manuel Guerrero Gomez , J. Refugio Castell Luna and others
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Landscaping LLC , Larry Vanderbilt, Sr. , Joffrey Vanderbilt and others
Counter_plaintiff:
Joffrey Vanderbilt , Larry Vanderbilt, Sr. and Vanderbilt Landscaping LLC
Counter_defendant:
Luis A Alberto Medi Ayon , Ruben Madera Canales , Diego Flores Cicernos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589
Sosa-Ortega v. Corkins et al
as 3:2010cv01162
Plaintiff:
Victor Sosa-Ortega
Defendant:
Samuel Corkins, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiltz v. Fortner et al
as 3:2009cv00296
Petitioner:
Ortega Wiltz
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
