Cases 21 - 30 of 252
BEYERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03393
Petitioner:
AMY BEYERS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLDEN v. FISCUS et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
SHAVEZ HOLDEN and SHAWVEZ NELSON
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, M. OVERMYER, Z. MOSLAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL OVERMYER, PA. DOC. DEREK F. OBERLANDER, UNIT SGT. MAHONEY and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES S. DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. CROWTHER et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
MICHELLE CROWTHER, FACILITY MANAGER OVERMYER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MENTEER and others
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
PELZER V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
(STGMU) SUPT. D. OVERMYER, SUPT. LEWIS FOLINO, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CAINE PELZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANGLE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00371
Defendant:
DARIK OBERLANDER, MICHEAL OVERMYER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. DOE et al
as 1:2019cv00333
Defendant:
MELISSA M. PETERSON, DORINA VARNER, DERRICK F. OBERLANDER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY CHARLES HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARSON v WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
ANDREW LESLIE, KIM SMITH, DR. J.J.Z. HOLDREN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
