Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System et al v. Sotera Health Company et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System and Oakland County Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association
Defendant:
Sotera Health Company, Michael Petras, Jr., Scott Leffler and others
Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association et al v. Generac Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association and Oakland County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Generac Holdings Inc, Aaron Jagdfeld and York A Ragen
Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association et al v. Opendoor Technologies Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01987
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association, Oakland County Employees Retirement System, Julio Maurice Bueno and others
Defendant:
Opendoor Technologies Incorporated, Eric Wu, Carrie Wheeler and others
Petitioner:
Chad Donnelly, Indiana Public Retirement System, Abdul Khalid and others
In re Opendoor Technologies Incorporated Securities Litigation
as 2:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Sam Alich
Defendant:
Opendoor Technologies Incorporated, Eric Wu, Carrie Wheeler and others
In Re:
Opendoor Technologies Incorporated Securities Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association, Oakland County Employees Retirement System, Indiana Public Retirement System and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Pueo Keffer, Glenn Solomon, Jason Kilar and others
Petitioner:
Abdul Khalid, Yusuf Baloch, Wenshan Wu and others
E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, et al v. NVIDIA Corporation, et al
as 21-15604
Defendant / Appellee:
COLETTE KRESS, NVIDIA CORPORATION, JEFF FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS PGB, Lead Plaintiffs and E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB
Defendant:
OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TRUST and OAKLAND COUNTY VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT ASSOCIATION TRUST
Walsh v. Grand Canyon Education, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00801
Defendant:
Grand Canyon Education, Inc., Brian E. Mueller and Daniel E. Bachus
Plaintiff:
Grant Walsh
Petitioner:
Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, Oakland County Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association Trust and Oakland County Employees Retirement System
In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2020cv00639
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bachus, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. and Brian E. Mueller
Plaintiff:
The City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, Oakland County Employees Retirement System and others
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System v. Pluralsight, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00128
Petitioner:
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System and the Oakland County Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association Trust, Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System, Sudeep Uprety and others
Defendant:
James Budge, Aaron Skonnard and Pluralsight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System
In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation
as 4:2018cv07669
Defendant:
NVIDIA Corporation, Jensen Huang, Colette Kress and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds, E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB and Stichting Pensioenfonds PGB
Petitioner:
Henry Keller, Meitav Dash Provident Funds and Pension Ltd., Jack Cravens and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Oto
Brennan, et al v. Zafgen, Inc., et al
as 16-2057
Plaintiff:
AVIAD BESSLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situtated and THEODORE J. DALY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY BRENNAN, RON KENNER, KEVIN KOZIATEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ZAFGEN, INC. and THOMAS E. HUGHES
Interested Party:
OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Movant:
BRENNAN GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
