Cases filed in Indiana
RICHARDSON v. THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv03095
Defendant: ELISE C.L. BOWLING, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL and THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY
Plaintiff: LATOYA RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01561
Defendant: ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND COMMISSIONER COMMITTEE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff: WAYDE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00386
Defendant: ANY AND UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS WHOM NAMES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND/OR COMMISSIONER COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff: WAYDE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff: CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
PERKINS v. OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01109
Defendant: MELLISSA HAYDEN-KRAMER, AMY M. JONES and OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
Plaintiff: STACY K. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00890
Defendant: NEWTON ALLEN, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff: CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MILLER v. CHIEF OF POLICE-IMPD et al
as 1:2013cv00001
Defendant: CHIEF OF POLICE-IMPD, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
Plaintiff: JAIME MILLER, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?