Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Officer Menclheim, Officer Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 4:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rambo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Rambo, Officer Cook, Officer Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Issac et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00686
Defendant:
Sgt. Lovejoy, Lt. Jones, Timothy D. Issac and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ricardo Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Gordy et al
as 2:2019cv00968
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Warden Gordy, Officer Mead and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance A Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Warden Richie , Warden Myers , Lieutenant Tomkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Wilson et al (INTAKE 2)
as 2:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Angela Wilson, Cathy Brown, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Drake et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
Jurrell Crawford
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Officer Wilson, Officer Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
