Cases 1 - 10 of 11
TRIBBLE v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HAWK TRIBBLE
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE, LT LAYNE, OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. HARVEY et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
SGT HARVEY, OFFICER BENNETT, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe, Yalondia Smith, Keyshia L. Bottoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv03803
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tremayne Stokes
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2021cv03548
Plaintiff:
Antonio Stokes
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Office and Officer Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boston v. Haralson County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Boston
Defendant:
Haralson County Jail, Sgt. Gates, Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boston v. Haralson County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv02663
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Haralson County Jail, Sgt. Gates and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. EVANS et al
as 1:2021cv00045
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, OFFICER JANE DOE, OFC. MRS. EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolston v. City of Atlanta Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv04221
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-5, Police Chief Rodney Bryant, Officer FNU Wadsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Tolston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Pooler, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Makeon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
