Cases 41 - 50 of 61
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolston v. City of Atlanta Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv04221
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-5, Police Chief Rodney Bryant, Officer FNU Wadsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Tolston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. The City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2020cv04074
Defendant:
Matthew Winn, Officers John Doe # 1-5, Christian Malstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bates and Lakeisha James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv02896
Defendant:
Female Officer Chisolm, Officer Rodgers, Dep. N. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Jane Does, Hillary Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beltran-Kelsey v. Roberts et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Sergeant- C. Head, Officer John Does, Deputy J. Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Beltran-Kelsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Pooler, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Makeon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRINGER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
MYDRIA STRINGER, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN FREDRICK J HEAD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JANE DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL-RAQUIB v. DOES
as 5:2019cv00346
Petitioner:
JORDAN VERNON EUGENE and BASIR TRE EYE EL-RAQUIB
Respondent:
PUBLIC OFFICER JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
