Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Walker v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv02896
Defendant:
Female Officer Chisolm, Officer Rodgers, Dep. N. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Jane Does, Hillary Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beltran-Kelsey v. Roberts et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Sergeant- C. Head, Officer John Does, Deputy J. Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Beltran-Kelsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Pooler, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Makeon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRINGER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
MYDRIA STRINGER, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN FREDRICK J HEAD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JANE DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL-RAQUIB v. DOES
as 5:2019cv00346
Petitioner:
JORDAN VERNON EUGENE and BASIR TRE EYE EL-RAQUIB
Respondent:
PUBLIC OFFICER JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. City of Sandy Springs et al
as 1:2019cv01129
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Sandy Springs, Officer Ryan Gehricke and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR et al
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER PAQUETTE, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR and others
Plaintiff:
JARVIS O'NEIL ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivins v. Carswell et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Antonio Carswell, FNU Given and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Sam Bivins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
