Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cole v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Luther Elvis Cole
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Michelle Thomas
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Esmaeil Porsa, Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clack v. City of College Station et al
as 4:2022cv02404
Plaintiff:
Robert Danny Clack, II
Defendant:
City of College Station, John Doe, John Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes v. Cagle et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Rolando Reyes, Jr
Defendant:
Johnny Cagle, O Mendoza, City of Lake Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Doe et al
as 4:2021cv02942
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Ford
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aloba v. United States, et al.
as 4:2021cv02139
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, United States, Sim Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Saddiq Aloba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. City Of College Station et al
as 4:2021cv02033
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City Of College Station, Officer Michael Pohl and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Young (I, Me) and Antonio Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Doe
as 4:2020cv02153
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Garrison McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Quaison et al
as 4:2020cv00862
Defendant:
Officer Quaison and Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Avivia Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becerra v. Tovar et al
as 7:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Andrew Garza, City of McAllen and others
Plaintiff:
Aldo Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
