Cases 1 - 10 of 690
Street v. Shermoen et al
as 0:2024cv04661
Defendant:
Jerrod Anthony Shermoen and State Court Administrators Office
Plaintiff:
Ryan Curtis Street
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Nelson v. Dakota County et al
as 0:2024cv04662
Defendant:
Dakota County, MEnd Correctional Care PLLC Employees John Doe 1-3 and Jane Doe 1-3, Dakota County Sheriff Office and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Lashaun Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Hernandez et al
as 0:2024cv04457
Defendant:
Scott County and Officer Marcos Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Shaylow Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04396
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sistrunk v. Moore et al
as 0:2024cv04013
Defendant:
Officer Esperum, Officer Henningway, Officer Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Cecil Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laehn v. Laehn et al
as 0:2024cv03909
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Laehn
Defendant:
Human Services of Faribault and Martin Counties, Troy G. Timmerman, Michael D. Trushenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.