Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv07128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
LLOYD v. POKORNY et al
as 5:2019cv04386
Defendant:
MAUREEN O'CONNOR, STATE OF OHIO, JOSHUA THORNSBERY and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. HOFFMAN et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
JOHN JAY HOFFMAN, MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, NJ, WILLIAM MOSCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv04298
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY JONES
Defendant:
NUTTER, DARRELL L. CLARKE, MARK SQUILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Sinclair v. Citi Mortgage Inc
as 12-4261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER M. SINCLAIR
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SALLY SINCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
CITI MORTGAGE INC, Dallas, TX; Columbus, OH; Ofallow, MO; and all its affilites and other locations
Kevin Twillie v. FBI Clevaland OH, et al
as 09-3182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. TWILLIE
Defendant - Appellee:
FBI READING PA, FBI PGH and FBI CLEVELAND OH
Raymond Stacey, et al v. City of Hermitage, et al
as 09-2064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND STACEY, Individually and as Co-Executor of the Last Will of Helen Stacey
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HERMITAGE, GARY P. HINKSON, EDWARD STANTON and others
Defendant:
WODZIANSKI & SMITH
Appellant:
JANICE HAAGENSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
